附近上门

If there鈥檚 one way to raise the hackles of cryptocurrency and blockchain enthusiasts, it鈥檚 mentioning regulation.

Why? For starters, the first successful implementation of blockchain technology, bitcoin, is in a libertarian ideology that鈥檚 averse to not just government oversight, but to the participation of any third party, trusted or not, in a transaction.

Follow 附近上门 News on &

And, sure, some cryptocurrency groups have decided to , and others from the government. But, in general, the early adopters and true believers in the community continue to view regulation in the same way most cats regard bathtime: uncomfortable, unwanted, but perhaps inevitable if they keep stinkin鈥� up the place.

But the regulation of ethereum and other blockchains is the proverbial talk of the town, or at least the wonkier blocks around SEC headquarters.

Bitcoin Is A Commodity

So far, in the United States, the Securities And Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are on the record as taking a 鈥溾�� approach to regulating the emerging blockchain sector. This very similar to Clinton-era verbiage concerning regulating the then-nascent web and e-commerce. (The describing that particular regulatory framework is a real treat for fans of vintage web design.) As tech policy researcher the Clinton policy, it鈥檚 鈥渁 high-tech Hippocratic oath.鈥�

And, for the most part, that鈥檚 the tack taken by contemporary regulators with bitcoin, the highest-value cryptocurrency in the market today. For exchange purposes, it鈥檚 been , and its users have been largely free of a government crackdown, provided that , and there鈥檚 no evidence of .

Is Ethereum A Commodity?

But an emerging class of blockchain assets built on the blockchain is leading some in Washington to consider regulating the second most valuable cryptocurrency, which has at time of writing, in a way that鈥檚 different from bitcoin. Why regulate ethereum? According to recent , it鈥檚 because ethereum tokens (referred to as 鈥渆ther鈥�) exhibit many characteristics of securities.

Being classified as a security instead of a commodity would subject ethereum and its trade to much stricter regulatory oversight. If, as the WSJ鈥檚 sources suggest, regulators continue to use the 鈥溾�濃�攁 1946 legal rule which says assets in a 鈥渃ommon enterprise鈥� whose value is tied to the efforts of managers or promoters are 鈥渋nvestment contracts鈥� and thus securities鈥攖hen ethereum and other protocols like may fall under the regulatory purview of securities, rather than commodities.

WSJ鈥檚 sources cite a number of factors, leading with the , which raised over 31,000 bitcoins in mid-2014. They also mentioned the ongoing and active management of the technology鈥檚 development, and forward-looking statements by Foundation leadership about the technology as reasons why ethereum acts more like a security in substance, if not always in form.

ICOs Are Probably Securities, But Is Their Most Popular Blockchain Infrastructure A Security Too?

The discussion of whether to regulate ethereum as a security is intertwined with a broader discussion of regulating initial coin offerings (ICOs). At this time, the SEC treats tokens sold in an ICO as securities, and accordingly holds their issuers to a set of standards around truthfulness in financial reporting, fiduciary responsibility, operational integrity, and the like.

On the other hand, treating ether itself like a security may not be the right approach. For one, the goal of ethereum is to create a reasonably open platform and protocol for decentralized applications, ERC20 tokens being the most popular example today. So it feels a bit like if a government went in to regulate, say, the Linux Foundation in a restrictive way. But here鈥檚 where that analogy breaks down: although Linux boxes facilitate untold amounts of economic activity, its price (generally free) isn鈥檛 tied to the number of other Linux users out there. While in the case of ethereum, the more applications that are built on top of its code, the more ether tokens may be worth.

But unlike bitcoin, the design of which doesn鈥檛 easily allow for many blockchain use cases like smart contracts, ethereum is the beneficiary of 鈥減latform economics鈥� akin to insofar as it becomes more valuable as more projects use it as foundational infrastructure. Ethereum, as a platform, benefits鈥攊n the form of price appreciation and being seen as a default option for new tokens鈥攆rom network effects in a way that bitcoin doesn鈥檛.

There Is No Good Answer Here

This is all to say that the question of whether ethereum is a security or a commodity is particularly thorny. CTFC chairman Christopher Giancarlo recently that bitcoin has 鈥渆lements of all of the different asset classes,鈥� and so does ethereum, perhaps even more so. How to treat these emerging assets is a tough regulatory nut to crack.

The Clinton administration labeled the internet a 鈥済lobal free-trade zone,鈥� but not an anarchy. that 鈥淸i]n many ways, electronic commerce is the Wild West of the global economy.鈥� Replace 鈥渆lectronic commerce鈥� with 鈥渂lockchain technology鈥� and that statement could apply just as well today. However, he followed up with 鈥渙ur task is to make sure it’s safe and stable terrain.鈥�

Over two decades later, the attitude of financial regulators toward ethereum is a chip off the old blockchain.

滨濒濒耻蝉迟谤补迟颈辞苍:听