附近上门

If you want a job at one of the hottest American startups, there鈥檚 a decent chance it鈥檒l be an on-site gig.

However, if it鈥檚 a software company whose output is fully digital, the likelihood of remote work goes way up.

Those were the findings from our latest survey of hiring practices at this year鈥檚 top-funded U.S. startups. Results showed remote hiring is the norm at top seed-stage software companies. But for the most heavily funded companies across sectors and stages, a majority are on-site or hybrid work environments.

The breakdown hews fairly closely to what we鈥檙e seeing at workplaces across varied industries, observed , a economics professor who work-from-home trends.

鈥淚t is definitely the case that tech is massively more into WFH than other industries,鈥� Bloom told 附近上门 News. A big reason, of course, is that many tech jobs can be done remotely very easily, which is not the case for, say, manufacturing or retail. Beyond that, Bloom notes: 鈥淭ech also genuinely seems very open to change, and WFH is new and different and they embraced this faster.鈥�

Highest funding recipients aren鈥檛 heavily remote

The latest data dive into remote work trends at funded startups revealed a split in hiring trends that correlates with industry and company stage.

As we observed in a February survey, roughly half of the most heavily funded U.S. startups required all or most employees to be on-site. Unsurprisingly, the biggest determinant for whether a company is remote or location-based appears to be whether it requires physical infrastructure beyond computers and cellphones.

When we updated the list, the findings were similar. We sampled job listings at the and found that, once again, roughly half were fully or predominantly on-site employers. This includes 鈥檚 , AI research company , and biomanufacturing unicorn .

Once again, few shockers. Obviously one can鈥檛 bore complex networks of underground tunnels or operate a million square feet of biomanufacturing space while sitting at home in pajamas clicking around on a laptop.

Funding recipients with only digital output, meanwhile, leaned remote. This was the case, for instance, with聽 , a developer of technology for building applications on the Ethereum blockchain, and , of NFT fame.

WFH rules at newer software startups

Meanwhile, at younger, software-focused companies, it looks like remote work is pretty much the norm today.

In an attempt to demonstrate this, we compiled a 1 that raised $10 million or more in seed funding this year. We then looked to see what portion of companies listed job openings as remote or .

Turns out, the overwhelming majority of companies on this list with published job openings were explicitly remote. Sure, they all have some geographic headquarters. But few expect employees to actually go there.

, an NFT platform that raised $50 million this spring, is a case in point. Per securities filings, it鈥檚 headquartered in California. But on its hiring page, the company touts: 鈥淥ur headquarters are the internet and we have employees all over the world.鈥�

, an employee benefits startup that raised $33 million in January, is another example. Although the company has offices in Connecticut and downtown Manhattan, its team is fully remote across the country.

It鈥檚 a sharp shift from the archetypal pre-COVID startup image, which featured lavish in-office snacks and big industrial-chic workspaces. The dominance of remote work among younger software startups, however, seems to indicate it is a rising trend and one that鈥檚 likely to stick.

Even firms that back hot startups are joining in. This month, Silicon Valley鈥檚 became the latest VC to embrace the remote way, that: 鈥渁16z is Moving to the cloud.鈥� The firm says its headquarters will now be 鈥渋n the cloud,鈥� although partners will聽 create physical offices globally.

So seed startup staffers are staying home. Is this a good thing?

At this point, there鈥檚 no argument as to whether you can scale a startup without a physical headquarters. The unsettled question is whether it鈥檚 the optimal approach.

For Bloom, there are clearly lower overhead costs for a remote workforce and it does help in casting a wider net for hiring. On the downside, he said: 鈥淚t seems harder to innovate when you are working remotely. It is harder to mentor, and it鈥檚 harder to build company culture.鈥�

, founder of the , echoes this notion. The fund, which works with new founding teams, has mentored both in-person and remote groups, when necessitated by the pandemic. In Tang鈥檚 view, the level of camaraderie and collaboration in the in-person groups is almost incomparably greater than in the remote ones.

鈥淛obs that are very well designed Point A to B, those are amenable to remote,鈥� Tang said. 鈥淏ut for early-stage startup creation, so much is the serendipity of the right conversation with the right person at the right time.鈥�

Illustration: