Global venture funding to financial technology startups totaled $12 billion across 751 deals in 2026 as of April 6, per 附近上门 . In terms of dollars invested, that鈥檚 up 5% year over year, but that money went into almost a third fewer deals.

As has been the case in previous quarters, startup accelerator Y Combinator was the most active investor in the space in Q1 by far, participating in 27 deals involving fintech startups. However, it鈥檚 interesting to note that YC鈥檚 deal volume in Q1 marked a multiquarter low, down 38.6% from the 44 fintech deals it took part in during the first quarter of 2025.

The next most active investor in the first quarter was , with 11 investments. , and all tied for third place, with nine deals each.

YC also topped the list of the most active fintech investors in rounds of $5 million or above, participating in 14 such transactions. That鈥檚 up 16.7% from the 12 deals involving fintech startups in which it participated in the first quarter of 2025.

Lightspeed and Coinbase Ventures came in next on the list of most active investors in rounds of $5 million or more 鈥� each writing checks into nine fintech startup investments during the 2026 first quarter.

When it came to leading rounds of $5 million or more, six venture firms tied with five investments each: , , and .

Top lead investors at $100M or more

For megarounds 鈥� those deals of $100 million or more 鈥� we saw more private equity enter the mix of lead or co-lead investors. , , and topped the list, according to 附近上门 data.

The largest rounds were raised by a diverse bunch of fintech startups.

• Predictions marketplace was the fintech sector鈥檚 largest recipient of capital in the first quarter. In March, the company doubled its valuation to $22 billion in just three months with a $1 billion raise led by Coatue. The New York-based startup had just raised $1 billion in Series E funding at an $11 billion valuation in December.
• In February, , a digital savings platform, raised $385 million in a Series E funding round co-led by Blue Owl Capital and Sixth Street Growth. The New York-based startup said its new valuation was $2 billion, double it achieved when raising its $125 million Series D round in December 2023.
• In late January, insurtech announced it had closed $366 million in equity funding led by The Space Between.
• And also in January, , which is building infrastructure for payments with stablecoins, raised $250 million in a Series C funding round led by . Its post-money valuation was $1.95 billion, up 17x from last March.

Top fintech investors at seed

When it comes to investing in seed rounds, unsurprisingly, Y Combinator again topped the list 鈥� by far, with 16 fintech deals. Next up was Coinbase Ventures with six investments at the seed stage, and then , with five.

The investor base shifted when we took a look at who led or co-led post-seed rounds in the first quarter. and topped that list, with five deals each. Peak XV Partners, Lightspeed and Accel came in next with four fintech investments each at the post-seed stage.

Related 附近上门 query:

Related reading:

• Fintech Startups Globally Raise More Money In Far Fewer Deals In Q1 2026
• Y Combinator Was By Far The Most-Active Fintech Investor in 2025, Data Shows

Illustration:

And as was the case in the Q4 as well, Q1 was well above the prior five quarters by funding amounts, signaling that European venture funding may be gaining momentum.

Table of contents

• AI above 50%
• UK and France grew YoY
• Europe by stage
• In summary
• Methodology
• Glossary of funding terms

Still, Europe saw more capital going into fewer companies in Q1, with deal volume plummeting 40% year over year. Much of the decline was at seed stage (down 44%) and early stage (down 30%), while late-stage deal volume was in-line with the previous four quarters.

AI above 50%

Funding to Europe-based AI startups increased significantly last quarter, reaching $9.2 billion, or more than half of total venture funding to the region. That marks the sector鈥檚 highest proportion in a quarter on record.

The largest four rounds to startups based in Europe in Q1 were for AI-related companies. Data center builder , autonomous driving developer , and frontier lab for physical AI raised more than a billion each, and AI legaltech 鈥檚 funding totaled more than $500 million.

UK and France grew YoY

Startups from the U.K. and France raised more funding in Q1, totaling $7.4 billion and聽 $2.9 billion, respectively. Germany-based startups raised $1.9 billion, flat year over year.

France has emerged as the European leader for AI frontier labs. Last quarter, it saw Paris-based , founded by former AI chief , raise $1 billion in the continent鈥檚 largest seed funding round on record. The deal also marked only the second billion-dollar-plus funding deal for a European frontier lab, following s $2 billion round last year.

Europe by stage

In Q1, late-stage funding to Europe-based startups nearly doubled from a year ago. The largest rounds were across a variety of sectors, including AI hardware, fintech, agentic AI, productivity software, sensors, defense, e-commerce and energy.

A total of $9.2 billion was invested at late-stage across 83 deals, up 91% by amounts year over year.

Early-stage funding to the region鈥檚 startups fell from a year earlier 鈥� by around 20% 鈥� 附近上门 data shows. Early-stage investment totaled $5.3 billion in Q1 across more than 240 funding rounds. Within early-stage funding, larger Series A rounds predominated in semiconductors, energy and healthcare.

Seed funding reached $3.1 billion in Q1 across more than 790 deals. The funding total was up 50% year over year, but largely due to the $1 billion round for Advanced Machine Intelligence.

In summary

Larger rounds into critical sectors in AI drove European startup funding up in Q1. A mix of Europe- and U.S.-based investors led the largest fundings last quarter into AI infrastructure, frontier labs, autonomous systems and applications.

Overall, Europe is in-line with global trends as capital concentrates into the largest deals in sectors that are surging due to AI.

Related 附近上门 query:

Methodology

The data contained in this report comes directly from 附近上门, and is based on reported data. Data is as of April 2, 2026.

Note that data lags are most pronounced at the earliest stages of venture activity, with seed funding amounts increasing significantly after the end of a quarter/year.

Please note that all funding values are given in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. 附近上门 converts foreign currencies to U.S. dollars at the prevailing spot rate from the date funding rounds, acquisitions, IPOs and other financial events are reported. Even if those events were added to 附近上门 long after the event was announced, foreign currency transactions are converted at the historic spot price.

Glossary of funding terms

Seed and angel consists of seed, pre-seed and angel rounds. 附近上门 also includes venture rounds of unknown series, equity crowdfunding and convertible notes at $3 million (USD or as-converted USD equivalent) or less.

Early-stage consists of Series A and Series B rounds, as well as other round types. 附近上门 includes venture rounds of unknown series, corporate venture and other rounds above $3 million, and those less than or equal to $15 million.

Late-stage consists of Series C, Series D, Series E and later-lettered venture rounds following the 鈥淪eries [Letter]鈥� naming convention. Also included are venture rounds of unknown series, corporate venture and other rounds above $15 million. Corporate rounds are only included if a company has raised an equity funding at seed through a venture series funding round.

Technology growth is a private-equity round raised by a company that has previously raised a 鈥渧enture鈥� round. (So basically, any round from the previously defined stages.)

Illustration:

This is a weekly feature that runs down the week鈥檚 top 10 announced funding rounds in the U.S. Check out last week鈥檚 biggest funding deal roundup here.

While no billion-dollar rounds led this week鈥檚 list, we nonetheless saw a variety of startups in industries ranging from semiconductors to aerospace to biotech raise sizable rounds. The week鈥檚 biggest deal was $400 million for SiFive, a semiconductor startup challenging incumbent with chip designs built on an open rather than proprietary standard.

1. , $400M, semiconductors: San Mateo, California-based semiconductor startup SiFive raised a $400 million Series G round led by . SiFive makes the blueprints used by companies such as to develop their own internal chip designs, on an open standard called RISC-V. CEO Reuters he expects the raise to be SiFive鈥檚 last funding round before an IPO, though didn鈥檛 say when an offering would take place.

2. , $200M, aviation: Hermeus, an El Segundo, California-based startup developing autonomous military aircraft, raised $200 million in equity in a -led round. The company, which is developing what it says will be the fastest unmanned defense aircraft, also raised $150 million in debt as part of the round, which pushes its valuation to $1 billion. Other investors in the deal include , and

3. $137M, biotechnology: San Diego-based Sidewinder, a biotech startup developing cancer drugs to target difficult-to-treat tumors, raised a $137 million Series B led by and . The company is developing聽next-generation cancer drugs called antibody-drug conjugates, or ADCs, which are designed to act like 鈥済uided missiles鈥� by using engineered antibodies to deliver toxic payloads directly into tumor cells. The company said its new funding will be used to push its lead drug candidates into clinical trials.

4. , $125M, AI infrastructure: Palo Alto, California-based Aria Networks raised $125 million in a -led Series A funding round. The company develops an AI-driven networking platform that monitors, analyzes and optimizes data center performance.

5. , $111.7M, aerospace: Starfish Space, a Seattle-based startup developing and manufacturing autonomous space vehicles that perform in-orbit, satellite servicing missions, raised $111.7 million. The Series B round was led by , and . Starfish鈥檚 spacecraft dock to satellites already in orbit to service and reposition them. They can also remove defunct satellites and debris from space.

6. (tied) , $100M, biotechnology: Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Stipple Bio raised a $100 million Series A round to advance its precision cancer therapies. The round was led by , and . Stipple aims to develop highly targeted cancer treatments that selectively attack cancer cells while minimizing damage to healthy tissue.

6. (tied) , $100M, health insurance: led the $100 million Series E for Chapter, a New York-based startup offering a Medicare navigation platform that provides advisory services for seniors seeking health coverage. Other investors include 鈥嬧��, and 1.

8. , $85M, fintech: Modus, a Philadelphia-based startup, raised $85 million in a -led seed and Series A round. The startup describes itself as a tech鈥慹nabled audit platform that acquires CPA firms and equips them with AI鈥慸riven audit tools to deliver higher鈥憅uality audits. and also participated in the deal.

9. , $80M, medical devices: and led the $80 million Series C for Menlo Park, California-based Endovascular Engineering, also called E2, which has developed a device called H膿lo for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, or VTE. The company secured clearance for H膿lo in December.

10. , $80M, biotechnology: Boston-based Life Sciences, which aims to develop drugs to promote longevity and find treatments for age-related diseases, says it raised $80 million in Series D funding. The company says it will use the funding to advance human trials of its cellular rejuvenation therapy, called ER-100, which aims to make older, damaged cells act younger again. Investors in the round were not disclosed. The company has previously been backed by , , , and.

Methodology

We tracked the largest announced rounds in the 附近上门 database that were raised by U.S.-based companies for the period of April 4-10. Although most announced rounds are represented in the database, there could be a small time lag as some rounds are reported late in the week.

Illustration:

Global venture funding to financial technology startups totaled $12 billion across 751 deals in 2026 as of April 6, per 附近上门 . That鈥檚 a 5% increase in dollars raised compared to the $11.4 billion raised across 1,097 鈥� or 31.5% fewer 鈥斅燿eals during the same time period in 2025.

This trend signals larger deal sizes. Indeed, late-stage or growth funding in the first quarter of 2026 totaled $6.9 billion, up 8% compared to $6.4 billion raised at those stages in the 2025 first quarter.

However, sequentially, the $12 billion raised is down 33% compared to the fourth quarter of 2025, when fintech startups raised $17.8 billion globally. The $6.9 billion raised in late-stage or growth funding is also down markedly 鈥� by 43% 鈥� compared to the $12.1 billion raised by fintech startups in Q4 2025.

The trend in the first quarter also mirrors what we saw in 2025 as a whole, with global venture funding to fintech startups climbing to its highest level in several quarters, boosted by later-stage deals.

Total global funding to VC-backed financial technology startups totaled $53.8 billion in 2025, per 附近上门 . That鈥檚 an approximately 29.3% increase from 2024鈥檚 total of $41.6 billion raised.

US booms

U.S.-based startups have historically raised more fintech funding than any other country in the world, and the first quarter of 2026 was no different.

Of the $12 billion raised by startups globally, just over half 鈥� or $6.3 billion 鈥� flowed to fintech companies based in the U.S. That was an impressive 47% increase compared to the $4.3 billion raised by U.S. fintech startups in the 2025 first quarter. However, it was down 50% from the $12.6 billion that U.S. financial technology startups raised in the fourth quarter of 2025.

The United Kingdom was the second-largest recipient of venture capital, with startups in the region raising a total of $1.2 billion. India came in third, raising $900 million.

Big deals for unicorns

Several fintech startups raised nine-figure rounds in the first quarter, with some doubling their valuations since their last venture financings.

Predictions marketplace was the largest recipient of capital in the first quarter. In March, the company doubled its valuation to $22 billion in just three months with a $1 billion raise led by . The New York-based startup had just raised $1 billion in Series E funding at an $11 billion valuation in December.

In February, , a digital savings platform, raised $385 million in a Series E funding round co-led by and . The New York-based startup said its new valuation was $2 billion, double it achieved when raising its $125 million Series D round in December 2023.

And in January, , which is building infrastructure for payments with stablecoins, raised $250 million in a Series C funding round led by . Its post-money valuation was $1.95 billion, up 17x from last March.

Investors remain bullish

, partner and head of U.S. at , said his firm has been investing at a slightly slower pace so far in 2026 than in years past. But he cited it as 鈥渕ore a quirk of deal flow鈥� and where it gets conviction, rather than a decision to slow the firm鈥檚 investing pace.

鈥淚t’s certainly true that macroeconomics and geopolitics play a role,鈥� he told 附近上门 News, 鈥渂ut mostly we’re just focused on finding high-conviction companies to back.鈥�

QED is extremely bullish on the application layer for AI in fintech and stablecoin opportunities, and has backed several startups that Gerety said 鈥渉arness the power of LLMs with the security and reliability guarantees that finance needs.鈥� (, which raised a $45 million Series B in January and is building an AI assistant for financial advisers, is one of those companies.)

鈥淛ust in the last few months, agents are now actually able to be effective in many processing tasks, but the stakes in finance are too high for LLMs to conquer financial workflows alone,鈥� Gerety said. 鈥淔inance runs on trust, not probability.鈥�

Looking ahead, he said QED remains bullish on fintech overall for the year. Part of the excitement is around the fact that larger companies are 鈥渢ransforming鈥� their operations with agentic workflows, Gerety noted.

鈥淢ore and more transformation is moving from the 鈥榗o-pilot鈥� phase, and we鈥檙e moving into the ‘OpenClaw’ phase, when reasoning agents will start to actually do all the work that was too tedious and slow to be done manually,鈥� he added.

The geopolitical situation will likely hinder some companies from taking the IPO plunge, in Gerety鈥檚 view, although a few companies in QED鈥檚 portfolios are 鈥渂ubbling.鈥�

, partner at , said his firm is on track to make eight to 10 core investments in Seed or Series A companies this year 鈥� about the same number as in previous years.

鈥淲e鈥檙e investing in AI-enabled applications while maintaining patience and focus in our deployment of capital,鈥� he said. 鈥淲e look for durable, enduring businesses that we believe will withstand the current hype cycle and investment frenzy.鈥�

While TTV is investing in AI-enabled companies, Kapur said it also agrees with that 鈥渁n AI reset is coming.鈥�

鈥淢any investors have already made their money by getting in on the ground floor, and others are trying to replicate their success,鈥� he told 附近上门 News. 鈥淲e鈥檙e focused on investing in the application layer of AI, and we鈥檙e still in the early days with more widespread prosperity and a democratization of enterprise value creation yet to come.鈥�

In particular, TTV sees the biggest opportunity in early-stage AI-native companies that are solving problems in mission-critical workflows 鈥渨hile building durable moats.鈥�

鈥淭hese platforms will earn the right to be distribution endpoints for financial products 鈥� and are even more valuable in the age of AI,鈥� he said.

He believes we may see some fintech IPOs in 2026, but that they will largely depend on how the potential mega IPOs (from the likes of , and ) perform.

鈥淚f those IPOs underperform, others may opt to stay private longer,鈥� Kapur said.

Looking ahead, he predicts we鈥檒l continue to see accelerated adoption of AI in financial services, first through straightforward applications, then more operationally complex use cases.

鈥淢ore broadly, we鈥檙e watching how the foundational LLMs further move up into the application layer, which is imperative to the long-term sustainability of their business models,鈥� Kapur said. 鈥淲e think financial services and fintech are unique enough categories where de novo startups and standalone businesses will beat platforms building experimental applications.鈥�

Related 附近上门 query:

Related reading:

• Fintech Funding Jumped 27% In 2025 With Fewer Deals But Bigger Checks
• Kalshi Secures $1B To Expand Predictions Market Platform
• Digital Savings Startup Vestwell Lands $385M, Doubles Valuation
• Stablecoin Startup Rain Raises $250M Series C at $1.95B Valuation 鈥� Its Third Round In Less Than A Year
• Exclusive: Zocks Raises $45M Series B From Lightspeed, QED For AI Assistant To Financial Advisers

Illustration:

鈥淚 recognized both the massive potential AI brought to the tax world, as well as the risks to firms and clients by making mistakes and hallucinations,鈥� he told 附近上门 News.

The accounting industry has historically been slow to adopt new technologies. As of today, the majority of small to mid-sized accounting firms 鈥� which make up 90% of the market 鈥� remain stuck in a cycle of manual data entry.

Addressing both the opportunities 鈥� and risks 鈥� that came with advances in AI, Haase started building , a tax prep automation startup, on the side in 2023. Rather than targeting the self-prep market, like does, or the mega-enterprise firms that can afford $15,000-per-return software, Juno was built for the underserved SMB accounting firm.

鈥淲e continuously 鈥榙og fed鈥� the early Juno prototypes into the firm to see what worked best, what slowed things down, and to make it the most efficient tax preparation platform as possible,鈥� Haase said.

It took about a year and a half just to build integrations. 鈥淲e had to do a bunch of hacky things to be able to work with the existing tax software,鈥� he explained, 鈥渂ecause your typical tax software is actually around 15 to 20 years old and they don鈥檛 have public APIs.鈥�

By 2024, Juno had launched a co-pilot. Then, in July 2025, it had a tax product. The startup began onboarding other tax firms, growing to nearly 500 customers over the past year. Last year, Haase sold his accounting firm to focus on growing Juno full-time.

Today, he鈥檚 announcing that San Diego-based Juno has raised $12 million in a seed funding round led by , including participation from and .

AI to help humans 鈥榖e the advisers they were trained to be鈥�

What makes Juno different from others in the market, Haase believes, is that it operates on the premise that, at least for the foreseeable future, human tax preparers should be the ones driving the tax-return preparation process.

鈥淎 business or high-net-worth tax return requires hundreds of calculations, edge cases, deductions and more,鈥� said Haase, who holds an MBA from . 鈥淎I simply can鈥檛 do that with the 100% accuracy required not to get audited or charged with tax fraud.鈥�

Describing much of the manual work that most accountants must perform to complete returns as extremely tedious, Haase acknowledges that it鈥檚 also very easy for accountants to make mistakes that could prove very costly.

鈥淚n school, if you get a 93, an A, you get all the credits,鈥� he said. 鈥淏ut on a tax return, if you have a 99%, you fail, and your client could pay the price in penalties.鈥�

In a nutshell, Juno acts as the bridge between a client鈥檚 raw documents and the accountant鈥檚 filing software. It performs tasks like pulling data from IRS forms and even unstructured documents, such as business financial statements. Overall, it automates 90% of data entry across more than 90 document types while also flagging prior-year changes and inconsistencies for human validation.

The result is that a process that typically takes a human two to three hours is shrunk down to seven to 10 minutes, Haase estimates.

鈥淲e do 95% of a tax return in minutes, leaving the accountant to handle the strategic human decisions 鈥� the parts that actually save the client money,鈥� he said.

While he declined to reveal hard revenue figures, Haase said that in just eight months, Juno grew to mid-seven-figure annual recurring revenue.

The startup sells on a per-return basis, starting around $45, dropping to the low $30s for high-volume firms.

‘s recent move into consumer taxes and OpenAI’s hiring of a tax director show that the bigger players are eyeing the tax market. But Haase doesn鈥檛 feel threatened.

鈥淗igh-wealth individuals want assurance. If you鈥檙e paying $40,000 in taxes, you don’t want to 鈥榗ross your fingers with a chatbot,鈥� he said. 鈥淵ou want a human to talk to, someone who understands the context of your life.鈥�

Juno isn’t trying to replace accountants, he added.

鈥淚t’s trying to rescue them from the data-entry basement so they can actually be the advisers they were trained to be,鈥� Haase said.

The startup plans to roll out business returns soon, a move that Haase expects will significantly scale its customer base.

鈥楢 huge, obvious pain point鈥�

, co-founder and managing director of Bonfire Ventures, said he was drawn to invest in Juno because he believes the company is going after 鈥渁 huge, obvious pain point in a category that hasn鈥檛 been meaningfully modernized in a long time.鈥�

鈥淭he workflow pain is real, the labor dynamics make the timing right, and Dave brought exactly the kind of founder-market fit you hope to see,鈥� Andelman told 附近上门 News via email. 鈥淗e lived this problem before he built the company. That always matters.鈥�

The investor believes that tax prep is a category where trust is crucial to product success.

鈥淚f you鈥檙e going to bring AI into that workflow, it has to be transparent, auditable, and built with a human in the loop,鈥� Andelman added. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 what Juno understood early, and I think that鈥檚 a big part of why the product is resonating.鈥�

Fintech startups, particularly those that apply AI to traditionally manual or burdensome processes, have benefited from increased investment in recent quarters. Total global funding to VC-backed financial technology startups totaled $53.8 billion in 2025, per 附近上门 . That鈥檚 a more than 29% increase from 2024鈥檚 total of $41.6 billion raised.

Related 附近上门 query:

Illustration:

For perspective, we charted out total investment, color-coded by stage, for the past 12 quarters below.

Of that total, $761 million went into late-stage and growth deals, up 158% compared to the $295 million that flowed into such deals in the first quarter of 2025. It鈥檚 also up 203% compared with the $251 million in late-stage and growth rounds that were raised by LatAm startups in the 2025 fourth quarter.

Table of contents

• Mexico leads
• Fewer deals
• Some big rounds
• Investor POV
• Methodology
• Glossary of funding terms

Mexico leads

Nearly one-third of the total amount raised in the first quarter went to one startup. Mexico City-based , an online used car marketplace, secured a $300 million Series F financing led by and in February.

Notably, mostly due to that outsized round, Mexican startups outperformed their Brazilian counterparts in the first quarter, raising a total of $404 million compared to Brazil鈥檚 $240 million.

Historically, Brazil has been the powerhouse in Latin America for venture capital funding. But it鈥檚 not the first time in recent quarters that Mexico has topped Latin America鈥檚 largest country. Mexico also raised more funding in the second quarter of 2025.

Overall, the first quarter marks only the second time since Q2 2012 that Mexican startups raised more venture capital than their Brazilian counterparts in Latin America, our data indicates.

Fewer deals

Round counts and total dollars raised decreased substantially sequentially and year over year across angel, seed and early stages. Of the $1.03 billion raised by Latin America鈥檚 startups in the first quarter, less than 9% 鈥� or $92 million 鈥� was raised across the angel and seed stages.

That compares to $161 million raised across those stages in the fourth quarter of 2025, and $152 million in the same first quarter last year.

Just over 17%, or $179 million, was raised at early stages, significantly lower than the $690 million raised in the fourth quarter and $472 million in the same period last year.

We expect the Q1 deal counts to rise somewhat over time, however, as seed rounds in particular are commonly reported weeks or months after they close.

Some big rounds

While Kavak鈥檚 round was the largest financing in Latin America in the first quarter, it was not the only nine-figure raise the region saw in Q1.

Argentinian fintech raised $195 million at a $3.2 billion valuation in March in a round led by .

Other large deals that took place in Q1 include:

• Mexico City-based , a financial app built around stablecoins, raised $70 million in a round co-led by and .
• Buenos Aires-based , a payments infrastructure startup, landed a $55 million Series C financing co-led by and.

Notably, the largest rounds included participation from high-profile global funds, including Andreessen Horowitz, Founders Fund, Sequoia Capital and Insight Partners.

Investor POV

, managing partner of New York-based , said his firm has made more than 60 investments in Latin America since 2022 鈥� steadily increasing its investment pace every year from 11 deals in the region in 2023 to 20 in 2025.

In his view, many of the global investors who began putting more funding into Latin America鈥檚 startups in recent years are still writing checks there. However, he acknowledges that some 鈥渕omentum鈥� investors have slowed down.

Still, 鈥渁lmost all of the long-term smart capital investors have remained very active,鈥� he said.

Last year was 鈥渁ll about stablecoins and fintech infrastructure鈥� for the region. We should expect more of that this year, along with increased AI use across all sectors and strong enterprise growth in Brazil, he told 附近上门 News.

Brazil continues to be Endeavor Catalyst’s top market, but it is watching startups across the region, including in countries such as Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, Chile and even smaller markets such as Ecuador, Peru and Uruguay.

Endeavor Catalyst has reason to be bullish on Latin America. Startups it has backed in the region are among the top performers of the firm鈥檚 portfolio. More than one-third (34%) of its 2026 Outlier class, which comprise roughly the top 10% best performers in its network, are from Latin America, according to Taylor.

, general partner at S茫o Paulo-based seed-stage firm , told 附近上门 News that his firm鈥檚 pace in Latin America has remained constant and 鈥渋ntentionally selective.鈥�

鈥淲e’ve always believed that seed in Latin America works best when you’re deeply involved with a small number of exceptional founders and not try to index the market,鈥� he noted.

But like many other investors, OneVC is also investing at an earlier stage.

鈥淥ne notable shift is that, as founding teams move faster than ever, often reaching product-market signal with leaner teams and AI-native tooling,鈥� Cartolano said, 鈥減re-seed is taking a larger share of our investments, and we expect that to continue being the case for this cycle.鈥�

Like Endeavor Catalyst, Brazil is OneVC鈥檚 primary market. It has a home court advantage, but as Cartolano notes, the country also has a lot going for it including being the largest economy in Latin America, one of the world’s most active early-adopter communities for new technology (, -native commerce, AI), and a regulatory environment 鈥� particularly in financial services 鈥� which in his view 鈥渢hat fosters innovation鈥�

As a secondary focus, interestingly, his firm is tracking an increasing number of strong Latino founders relocating to the United States to build companies.

鈥淲e like that,鈥� he said. 鈥淭hey combine deep operational instincts from LatAm with access to the largest addressable market and most liquid exit environment.鈥�

He agrees with Taylor that global interest appears to be renewing in Latin America startups.

鈥淭here is no shortage of capital for the best companies in the region, regardless of the state, and we are seeing some large firms investing in LatAm for the first time or coming back after a long period,鈥� he said.

And while fintech has historically dominated when it comes to venture funding in Latin America, Cartolano said that fintech is now unsurprisingly giving way to AI-first companies that sell services, particularly to enterprises.

鈥淭he broader market is also shifting from consumer-facing models toward B2B, as enterprise companies are more incentivized than ever to adopt new technologies,鈥� he added. 鈥淥neVC is especially focused on GenAI companies that 鈥榮ell work,鈥� replacing headcount and outsourced services with AI-driven delivery at a fraction of the cost.

Related reading:

• In Q2, Mexico Surpasses Brazil In Venture Dollars For First Time In Over A Decade

Methodology

The data contained in this report comes directly from 附近上门, and is based on reported data. Data is as of March 31, 2026.

Note that data lags are most pronounced at the earliest stages of venture activity, with seed funding amounts increasing significantly after the end of a quarter/year.

Please note that all funding values are given in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. 附近上门 converts foreign currencies to U.S. dollars at the prevailing spot rate from the date funding rounds, acquisitions, IPOs and other financial events are reported. Even if those events were added to 附近上门 long after the event was announced, foreign currency transactions are converted at the historic spot price.

Glossary of funding terms

Seed and angel consists of seed, pre-seed and angel rounds. 附近上门 also includes venture rounds of unknown series, equity crowdfunding and convertible notes at $3 million (USD or as-converted USD equivalent) or less.

Early-stage consists of Series A and Series B rounds, as well as other round types. 附近上门 includes venture rounds of unknown series, corporate venture and other rounds above $3 million, and those less than or equal to $15 million.

Late-stage consists of Series C, Series D, Series E and later-lettered venture rounds following the 鈥淪eries [Letter]鈥� naming convention. Also included are venture rounds of unknown series, corporate venture and other rounds above $15 million. Corporate rounds are only included if a company has raised an equity funding at seed through a venture series funding round.

Technology growth is a private-equity round raised by a company that has previously raised a 鈥渧enture鈥� round. (So basically, any round from the previously defined stages.)

Illustration:

led the company鈥檚 Series A, which was raised in just three weeks and included participation from repeat backers and . The round also included an investment from new strategic backer , a real estate and technology investment firm. It brings New York-based Trayd鈥檚 total funding to $17 million.

Co-founder and CEO grew up in a New York construction family, watching her father navigate razor-thin margins and complex compliance requirements.

鈥淚 saw firsthand the operational strain that comes with juggling union rules, multistate labor laws, and endless manual back-office processes,鈥� she recalls.

The experience inspired her to team up with , the company鈥檚 CTO, who spent 10 years as 鈥檚 web platform lead, to start Trayd in 2021.

Specialty trade service

For the unacquainted, specialty trade contractors are businesses that place skilled workers on job sites to perform the actual physical building work. These contractors include concrete crews, electricians, plumbers, ironworkers, painters and fireproofing. They’re distinct from general contractors, who manage and coordinate projects overall but don’t typically perform the hands-on trade work themselves.

Trayd automates payroll, HR, compliance and labor cost tracking for such contractors. Among the benefits it touts are providing real-time visibility into the costs of labor, equipment and materials.

The startup aims to substantially cut the time specialty trade contractors spend on its weekly payroll and compliance process.

鈥淲hat used to take 14 hours of manual work can now be done in under 30 minutes,鈥� Berger told 附近上门 News.

Trayd is working to fill what it believes is a unique gap in the market. While there are significantly more specialty trade contractors than general contractors, the majority of construction technology has been built for the latter, Berger believes.

The startup鈥檚 closest competitors are legacy payroll providers like and , along with newer companies like and .

鈥淭he difference is that most of these systems weren鈥檛 built for the complexity of specialty trades,鈥� Berger explains. 鈥淭rayd was.鈥�

Streamlining payroll

In construction, compensation is uniquely complex, Berger said. A single worker might earn four different pay rates in a single day depending on the specific trade task, the project scope and the jurisdiction.

鈥淕eneric鈥� payroll platforms cannot handle this constant rate variability, contends Berger. For example, payroll admins might receive stacks of paper timesheets or phoned-in hours from various job sites. Then they have to manually key all of that field data into Excel spreadsheets and calculate the pay rates by hand, factoring in union rules, prevailing wage requirements and state-by-state taxes.

They might then have to cross-check the spreadsheet math and manually double-enter the finalized numbers into a generic payroll system, and then again into their accounting software.

Trayd, according to Berger, dramatically reduces the time to perform all those tasks by capturing the time data directly from the field and automatically calculating the correct variable pay rates, union deductions, and multistate taxes.

鈥淯nlike salaried workforces, construction workers can earn multiple different rates in a single day depending on the trade, the project, and whether the work falls under prevailing wage, state or union requirements,鈥� she said. 鈥淭rayd was designed from day one to handle that complexity.鈥�

National expansion

The product seems to be resonating in the industry. Trayd has grown revenue over 600% year over year and moves tens of millions of payroll dollars each week, according to Berger. Several hundred contractors use Trayd weekly. , and are among its customers.

The startup operates on a SaaS model, with pricing tied to the number of workers processed through payroll.

Trayd started in New York and the broader Northeast, where union density and regulatory complexity are highest. It is now expanding nationally. Presently, it has about two dozen employees.

Before Trayd, Berger co-founded , a consumer social platform that is now defunct.

She acknowledges that being female founders in a male-dominated industry has not been easy.

鈥淎s women building in construction 鈥� where we’re outnumbered 9 to 1 鈥� the default assumption is that we’re too far removed or don’t have access to truly understand the problems on the ground. In the early years especially, there’s a ‘prove it twice’ dynamic. Without the benefit of the doubt, we had to earn credibility through repetition 鈥�- every meeting, every deal, every product decision. We’ve had to work twice as hard to be taken seriously,鈥� she told 附近上门 News. 鈥淏ut that pressure becomes an advantage. You show up more prepared, you listen more closely, and you build conviction faster. Over time, that compounds into a better product and deeper, more trusted customer relationships.鈥�

, general partner聽at White Star Capital, said his firm was first impressed by Trayd鈥檚 founding team, describing Berger and Kessler as 鈥渁 rare combination.鈥�

鈥淎nna鈥檚 background and family ties to the space allow her to understand the unique pain points contractors face from the inside,鈥� he wrote via email. 鈥淐ara brings the technical depth to build mission-critical systems without sacrificing product simplicity.鈥�

Beyond the caliber of the founders, White Star also believes that Trayd stands out because 鈥渋t is truly a better product for its customers.鈥�

鈥淥n a technical level, we were very impressed by how thoughtfully the product has been built,鈥� Lee added. 鈥淲e see that as a real advantage, because by structuring data cleanly at the system level, Trayd is better positioned to scale reliably and to become a strong foundation for AI in the construction industry over time.鈥�

Venture investment in property technology startups has rebounded in recent years after plunging from the pandemic peak. In 2025, startups in the sector pulled in approximately $10.5 billion in seed- through growth-stage financing globally, per 附近上门 . That鈥檚 up about 17% from $9 billion in 2024, with much of the recent investment going to startups that promise greater ROI through the use of automation or AI.

Related 附近上门 query:

Related reading:

• Sector Snapshot: Real Estate Tech Funding Sees Slight Rebound, But Still Far Lower Than Peak Years
• Exclusive: Rebar Lands $14M To Help HVAC Suppliers Generate Quotes Faster With AI

Illustration:

The fundraise includes $1 billion for KP22, a fund to back early-stage companies, and $2.5 billion targeted for growth-stage investments.

It鈥檚 a considerable increase in capital commitments compared to the last time the Silicon Valley-based firm raised a flagship fund, back in 2024. In that raise, Kleiner just over $2 billion for funds to back early- and later-stage startups.

This time around, Kleiner believes market fundamentals look particularly attractive for scaling up.

鈥淭he AI super-cycle is one of the most important company-building moments in our lifetimes, and we are still in the early innings,鈥� its fundraising announcement states. Kleiner also notes that AI is enabling today鈥檚 startups to iterate and grow faster than in past cycles.

Founded in 1972, Kleiner has long been known as a cross-industry investor, active in virtually every popular sector for venture dealmaking. For its latest fund, the firm also identified a broad array of focus areas, including professional services, healthcare, autonomy, security, financial services and the physical economy.

Recent investments

Most recently, Kleiner, like most venture heavyweights, has been focused on AI startups. Beyond that, however, its portfolio companies are a highly varied lot.

To illustrate, we used 附近上门 data to put together a list of the latest reported rounds in which it served as a lead or co-lead investor. It spans healthcare, accounting and cybersecurity, among other areas.

Large lead investments

While it鈥檚 active in seed- and early-stage dealmaking, Kleiner also leads quite a few larger rounds. Over the past year, it鈥檚 been lead investor in at least five valued at $150 million or more, which we list below.

Of these, the largest was a $600 million Series F for , a developer of autonomous vehicle technology. The next-largest include a $356 million Series D for , focused on secure open-source software for AI systems, and a $300 million Series E for , the AI legal tech unicorn.

Exits too

Kleiner has also seen a few sizable recent exits for portfolio companies that it backed as lead investor. This includes last year鈥檚 largest software IPO 鈥� 鈥� which counted Kleiner as Series B lead investor.

The firm was also an early lead investor in business credit card provider , which agreed to acquire this year for $5.15 billion.

Of course, Kleiner also has much more famous portfolio investments in its more distant past, including , and , to name a few. You don鈥檛 last 50 years in the venture business without at least some of those too.

Related 附近上门 queries:

Related reading:

• Capital One To Buy Fintech Startup Brex At Less Than Half Its Peak Valuation In $5.15B Deal

Illustration:

In that moment, “you鈥檙e in a very tough spot mentally and emotionally,” Gerstenzang recalled about the experience. 鈥淭o feel taken advantage of 鈥� and then feel that the person you love isn’t being honored the way they should 鈥� it鈥檚 not a good feeling.鈥�

The experience left the serial entrepreneur so disappointed that he felt compelled to offer others in similar situations better options. So in January 2024, he teamed up with to launch New York-based , which describes itself as a “contemporary funeral home without the home.”

When a person is overcome with grief, making so many decisions related to what is often the biggest unplanned purchase of many people鈥檚 lives can be daunting. Meadow aims to make it as simple as possible by allowing families to arrange funerals over the phone or online. The startup also partners with a curated set of venues so funerals can happen, for example, at a wedding venue that鈥檚 only booked on Saturday nights or at a local chapel rather than a funeral home.

鈥淏ecause we鈥檙e software-enabled and not stuck in the way things used to be, we can offer honest pricing and unmatched hospitality,鈥� Gerstenzang told 附近上门 News in an interview.

Meadow recently raised a $9 million Series A funding round led by and following a $2 million seed round in 2024, it told 附近上门 News exclusively. Uniquely, the initial capital for both Meadow and Moxie came from the founders’ own permanent capital firm, a vehicle they use to lead their own seed rounds.

Lower costs, more software

Meadow operates by stripping away the most expensive part of the business: the real estate. By forgoing physical storefronts and using software for administrative tasks, Meadow claims it can offer dramatically lower prices.

The national median cost of a funeral with a viewing and burial in 2023 was $8,300, while the median cost of a funeral with cremation was $6,280, to the .

Meadow says that its services are significantly more affordable. A typical funeral can cost around just $1,300, according to Gerstenzang.

鈥淭here are a lot of markups on coffins [at funeral homes], because of the increased rate of cremation,鈥� he explains. 鈥淪o a lot of funeral homes really want you to do a burial. They want you to do an elaborate service because that’s how they make their money. And there’s a ton of markup embedded in that.鈥�

From fintech to funerals

Gerstenzang is no stranger to scaling complex systems. An alumnus of payments giant , where he led product teams for consumer payments, he and Gilsanz in 2022 also co-founded , which helps nurses open medspas. In founding both companies, Gerstenzang has noticed a pattern: highly regulated markets that impact millions of people but haven’t seen meaningful innovation in decades.

In the funeral industry, he saw a landscape dominated by private-equity rollups. He claims that some large corporations buy up local family funeral homes, keep the original names on the doors to build false trust, and then quietly hike prices.

Meadow鈥檚 business model seems to be resonating. The company grew its revenue 3x from 2024 to 2025 and is on track to triple it again in 2026, according to Gerstenzang. The company worked with more than 400 families in February alone, he said.

After becoming the largest independent funeral home in California, the company recently expanded into Texas and Washington, with Arizona and five other states on the horizon this year.

Today, nearly a third of Meadow鈥檚 business comes from “pre-planning” 鈥� from people who, for example, have just navigated the process of burying their own parents, and want to spare their children the same burden. It also offers both a direct cremation and a funeral, depending on a family鈥檚 wishes.

鈥淲e fundamentally care about the quality of what we do,鈥� Gerstenzang said. 鈥淲e believe we can actually increase quality as we scale because our software allows our team to spend their time working directly with customers, rather than dealing with paperwork the same way it鈥檚 been done for 50 years.鈥�

, founder and general partner at Meadow investor Haystack, noted that that his firm was also among the earliest investors in and .

Backing 鈥榖roken, unsexy鈥� industries

鈥淲e know when there’s a broken, unsexy industry that hasn’t adapted to serve the modern consumer,鈥� he wrote via email. 鈥淢eadow’s combination of software operations with unmatched hospitality is exactly what the deathcare industry needs and what families deserve.鈥�

Related reading:

• Startups Look To Streamline Tasks Around Death And End-of-Life Planning
• More Funded Startups Focus On Dying And Bereavement

Illustration:

Onboarding new vendors often requires tax forms, compliance checks and obtaining bank information. For smaller, one-off tasks 鈥� say, ordering flowers for a one-time corporate event 鈥斅燼ll that overhead can prove more trouble than it鈥檚 worth.

Enter . The New York-based startup aims to help large companies pay small, one-time, or irregular vendors without the administrative headache or risk that comes with onboarding them.

Candex essentially acts as a tech-based master vendor. A large company sets Candex up in its system once and when it wants to make a purchase from a small supplier, it pays Candex, which then handles the compliance, tax and payment delivery to the actual supplier.

Today, the company shared exclusively with 附近上门 News that it has raised funding from longtime customer London-based bank to extend last July’s -led $33 million Series C to $40 million. The company says the financing brings its total funding to over $120 million since its 2011 inception.

Existing backers include , , and .

The raise comes amid a wider surge in funding to fintech startups. Global funding to VC-backed financial technology startups totaled around $53 billion in 2025, per 附近上门 . That鈥檚 a roughly 27% increase from 2024. Like Candex, many of the more heavily funded fintech startups in recent quarters focus on helping companies automate and streamline their processes, often through use of AI.

Bigger footprint

Founded by and , Candex says it surpassed $1 billion in payments in 2025. While it did not disclose hard revenue figures, the company makes money primarily through transaction fees on purchases made through its platform, similar to how a credit card interchange fee works.

It counts hundreds of Fortune 2000 companies among its customers, including HSBC, , , , , and , among others.

The company claims its biggest value proposition is that it solves tail spend (the majority of a company’s suppliers that account for a small percentage of its total spend) in a way that is 鈥渟imple, compliant, and fully integrated into existing enterprise systems.鈥�

鈥淐andex does not ask companies to change how they buy,鈥� said Lappin. 鈥淚t works within their existing procure-to-pay process.鈥�

The startup also says one of its biggest differentiators is that it uses automation and AI for invoice and tax verification.

It plans to use the new capital to expand globally, particularly its footprint in Asia and the Middle East, and further automate its offering. Presently, it has more than 270 employees and operates in more than 50 countries.

For its part, HSBC says its decision to invest comes after years of being a Candex customer. 鈥淲e see Candex as a differentiated solution for helping large organizations improve vendor management and operational efficiency at scale,鈥� , group chief procurement officer at HSBC, said in a press release.

Related 附近上门 query:

Illustration:

Correction: This story has changed since its original publication to clarify terms of the deal.